Moon Landing Hoax


For many, the fake moon landings constitute one of the hardest facts to accept due to emotional ties. If you believe NASA landed on the moon, it’s time for you to question your indoctrination – the American moon landings were 100% FAKE – the government (and every other government), along with its media and academia sold you a BIG f****** lie and you believed it.

I’m truly sorry if it injures your cherished beliefs but don’t fret too much as we all believed it at one time. It’s normal to assume that your government loves you and is the repository of truth. It’s normal to assume that astronomers, engineers, and physics majors at universities, etc. would have had enough independently-minded brains to come out and uncover the fraud. It’s normal to assume that CNN and the media would have had a big breaking stories about the fake moon landings. Unfortunately, your assumptions were entirely wrong.

Normally, I leave open the possibility of human error and avoid absolute certainties but with respect to the moon landings, we are 100% positive that the moon landings were all fake and it’s time the rest of the world knew. It’s not difficult to prove the fakery as you only need a critical mind and common sense.

Yes, we have all heard the “debunking” claims that the conspiracy would have had to have been too big to conceal it, that the moon landings were monitored by Ham radio operators, we can bounce lasers off of the moon, or we have pictures of the landing sites. I’m here to tell you that these so-called proofs are utter nonsense.

Human beings must become more than mere parrots of official stories. You owe it to yourself to read through these proofs and to do your own research. Even the media is starting to recognize that the moon landings were faked. However, once you come to the realization that the moon landings were faked, there are a few inescapable conclusions you must reach:

  • NASA has perpetrated a tremendous fraud on the world and cannot be trusted; all NASA missions should be presumed fraudulent unless proven otherwise with overwhelming evidence
  • There will not be a Mars landing anytime soon and it’s right to assume that there’s no rover on Mars at this time
  • All first and second world countries failed to reveal the big lie and are controlled in some manner; all other lunar landings by China, Japan, Russia, etc. are also likely fraudulent
  • There was no big space race between the Americans and the Russians – it was fake
  • The media cannot be trusted as they only repeat the patent lies of NASA
  • Big universities, professors, astrophysicists, engineers, etc. all failed to uncover the OBVIOUSLY faked moon landings; they’re either controlled directly or indirectly through conformity
  • Space X has failed to reveal the fake moon landings and speaks of a Mars mission; Space X is also likely fraudulent

If you have questions or points you would like to add, please post them in the thread.

(1) a ridiculous papier-mâché Lunar Lander complete with black paper, tape, gold aluminum foil, and curtain rods, that (i) achieved speeds up to 4,000 mph on descent and ascent; (ii) was NEVER tested or flown on earth; (iii) had an inexplicable ability to maintain life support (with ample room) for several days (the Apollo 17 astronauts were supposedly on the moon for 3 days, 2 hours, 59 minutes and 40 seconds); (iv) could absorb substantial amounts of dust inside the pressurized cabin without a problem (the two Apollo 17 astronauts re-entered the Lunar Lander on three occasions after even driving a dune buggy around the surface); (v) remarkably lacked all traces of dust on the landing pads; (vi) had enough room to hitch on a fold-up dune buggy on later flights along with extra 1960’s batteries and tires; (vii) the ascent engine had NEVER been tested – not even turned on to see if it works; (viii) included one miraculous air conditioning system in the harshest environment imaginable [the temperature on the moon varies from -387 Fahrenheit (-233 Celsius), at night, to 253 Fahrenheit (123 Celsius) during the day]; (ix) the astronauts were able to land this contraption with ZERO practice in a similar machine and without visibility; and (x) NASA risked the huge possibility that the astronauts would accidentally land on a big rock (look how far off the ground the rocket nozzle is) or crater and cause the Lunar Lander to crumble on impact.

(2) no blast crater or scorching caused from the Lunar Lander’s 10,000 lb. thruster;

(3) the craft, the Apollo suits, and cameras had no protection from radiation, micrometeorites, and the other elements on the moon and in space including immediate temperature fluctuations of 540 degrees Fahrenheit while in and out of the shade;

(4) a VERY long series of photo fakery and patent proofs of photo editing, e.g., the Michael Collins faked spacewalk photo (for starters, review the photo analyses of Jack White –;

(5) many examples of astronauts suspended by wires;

(6) everything was in slow motion, yet everything should have moved quicker;

(7) use of 1960s movie technology, i.e., artificial backdrops (visible 3M Scotchlite glass screen) with visible lines;


Do you see the carpet layer separating the foreground from the backdrop?  For more information see Jay Weidner’s discussion on how the filming technique known as “front screen projection” was used to fake the moon landings.

(8) thousands of beautiful studio qualify photos without the ability to manually adjust aperture, use the viewfinder, etc. and without secondary light sources;

(9) no picture of the stars – ever, even when the astronauts were supposedly orbiting on the dark side of the moon and using long exposure times;

(10) proof of secondary light sources and major shadow discrepancies, including a 130 degrees shadow direction shift over a small area that is clearly not perspective;

(11) the ridiculous Lunar Rover – do you really believe NASA would have risked attaching a dune buggy on the Lunar Lander or the possibility that it would break down far away from the Lander or cause a part to shake loose on one of the astronaut’s suit due to the rover hitting a large bump or crashing (think about this one);

(12) using circular windows to fake an unremarkable image of the earth, with a cloud that spans the entire diameter of the earth;

(13) no one has allegedly been beyond 400 miles above the earth for nearly 42 years (last time on the moon was December 14, 1972) and yet were able to do it easily in 1969 and travel a minimum of 234,000 miles to the moon;

(14) the astronauts sat on top of a 10,000 lb. thruster but noise was not an issue in the recordings;

(15) a disappearing Lunar Lander on the moon in the photos and repeated use of similar mountain backdrops in what should have been different areas;

(16) strange and nonexistent tracks of the Lunar Rover; also, Lunar Rover tracks appear before the Lunar Rover was even unpackaged;

(17) the sun appears to be a giant light bulb;

(18) American patriotic symbols – always perfect in the photographs;

(19) remarkable boot prints with no moisture;

(20) the film of the ascension stage of the Lunar Lander – laughable footage filmed by the astronaut who stayed behind to watch and who idiotically panned out and up (of course NASA claims it did it by remote 234,000 miles away) and then beamed the footage back to earth – and we didn’t even have decent television remotes at that time;

(21) the Command Module orbits a fake moon;

(22) the billowing American flag – oops;

(23) the 200 yard touchdown pass – wait how come we didn’t see that or other great feats?;

(24) the Van Allen Radiation Belts and other alleged severe cosmic radiation;

(25) the first moonwalkers’ press conference – the unwilling liars’ affair;

(26) the video footage of the docking Lunar Lander appears eerily similar and fake as Kubrick’s “2001: A Space Odyssey”;

(27) the discrepancies of the moonwalkers, did they see stars or not?;

Michael Collins wrote on page 221 of Carrying the Fire: “My God, the stars are everywhere: above me on all sides, even below me somewhat, down there next to that obscure horizon. The stars are bright and they are steady. Of course I know that a star’s twinkle is created by the atmosphere, and I have seen twinkle-less stars before in a planetarium, but this is different, this is no simulation, this is the best view of the universe that a human ever had.”
Dr Edgar Mitchell, officially the sixth man to walk on the Moon on Apollo expounded to the large audience about how his life had been transformed by the voyage to the Moon on Apollo 14. Edgar explained that as the vehicle revolved to allow solar cooling: he was astounded by the alternating view of the Sun, the Earth and above all the incredible ‘heavenly’ view of the stars. Dr Mitchell explained that the stars were ‘magnificent’, and described them as being ‘ten times brighter’ than when observed from Earth.  In fact he credited this vista with changing his life, as the euphoric effect led him to engage in the pursuit of, among other things, Eastern philosophic studies.

(28) an ISS astronaut said that NASA cannot go beyond Earth’s orbit;

(29) perfect performing 1960s technology that cannot be matched today;

(30) the “spectacular” photos of the landing sites on the moon … wait a second they are awful and show nothing;

(31) NASA lost much of the footage, diagrams, etc.;

(32) the Lunar Rover was nothing more than a radio controlled dune buggy;

(33) the moon rock that became petrified wood and the fact that von Braun just happened to take a trip to Antarctica with NASA’s management shortly before the Apollo moon landing missions, which is the same very place where moon rocks can be found on earth;

(34) third party stage hands appearing on video when there should only be two astronauts;

(35) the inadequate space and impossibility for three astronauts to live for approximately 12 days in space in a tiny craft while stuck only in a sitting position;

(36) the gray color of the soil on the moon is the wrong color;

(37) impossibly quick answers between those supposedly on the moon and NASA (timing delay off);

(38) the earth is pictured too small from the moon (the earth would be 4x the diameter of the moon);

(39) the unreasonable jump to landing on the moon and alleged jumps in technology in a span of only 11 years;

(40) the Command Module did not have enough fuel to make it to the moon and back since the gravitational pull of the earth allegedly extends all the way to the moon;

(41) the Apollo astronauts’ suits were clearly not pressurized – they should have looked like the Michelin Man; also, one of the astronauts appears to even have a bare hand during one video segment;

(42) the minerals kicked up by the European Space Agency’s SMART-1 probe were mistakenly different than the Apollo rocks;

(43) 60% of the much simpler Lunar Lander testing vehicles crashed (supposedly used by the astronauts to prepare for actually landing the real Lunar Lander) – do you think Armstrong would have been ready to fly an untested and never flown Lunar Lander on the moon after this?;

(44) Von Braun said in his book ‘”Conquest To The Moon” (published in 1953) that it would be impossible to send anyone to the moon because of the sheer size of craft needed to do the trip; taking Von Braun’s calculations into consideration, a spaceship that needed to travel that distance would have had to be 266 times bigger than the Saturn 5;

(45) the broken strut on the Lunar Lander;

(46) the lunar soil in the Apollo pictures is nothing more than Portland cement;

(47) leaked video of the Apollo astronauts on a studio set that looks exactly like the moon ( and a leaked photo of Wernher von Braun Strolling on the set of the moon (;

(48) you cannot hear sound in a vacuum and yet sounds were clearly recorded on video while the astronauts were allegedly working on the moon;

(49) a third person is seen outside the command module which is supposed to be in space (;

(50) NASA has now admitted that the Van Allen Radiation Belts (“an area of dangerous radiation”), prevent human travel: “Radiation like this can harm the guidance systems, onboard computers, or other electronics on Orion . . . Naturally, we have to pass through this dangerous zone [Van Allen Radiation Belts] twice – once up and once back . . . Sensors aboard will record radiation levels for scientists to study. We must solve these challenges before we put people through this region of space”;

(51) Parallax testing proves the moon landing photographs were fake (see and

Conclusion of the parallax study by Dr. Oleg Oleynik:

“The Apollo 15 photographic record contradicts the stereoscopic parallax verification method. The apparent change in the relative positions of objects by moving the camera when the camera angles are separated by several tens of cms show that:

  • the distance to distant objects such as mountains is not tens of kilometres but is no more
    than a few hundred metres;
  • the landscape is not continuous, but with clear lines of separation;
  • there is movement between nearby sections of the panorama relative to other sections.

Thus, based on the above examples, this study concludes that the Apollo 15 photographic record does NOT depict real lunarscapes with distant backgrounds located more than a kilometre away from the camera.

These pictures were, without doubt, taken in a studio set – up to 300 metres in size. A complex panorama mimicking the lunarscape shows degrees of movement, such as horizontal and vertical changes to give an impression of imaginary distance to the objects and perspective.”

(52) The best alleged “proofs” that NASA made it to the moon – the moon reflectors (proof of nothing, which would be covered in dust by now anyway), the landing site photos, (a laughable and PhotoShop joke), the testimonies (varying and peculiar), moon rocks (which are unaccounted for and can be found on earth and sometimes turn into petrified wood), the moon/hammer experiment (possibly faked with wires and impossible with the pressurized suit to hold the feather with finger tips), and the ham radio operators (how did they know the transmission came from the surface of the moon and not just a supposed satellite, assuming they weren’t paid shills) – is this really the best NASA could think of to prove such a historic event?

For more research, see the following websites:


© 2017   Taboo Conspiracy | Powered by WordPress | Log in