Welcome to Taboo Conspiracy

Taboo Conspiracy

Welcome to the site that fears no discussion, no matter how allegedly ridiculous or unpopular. Please visit the About Us page for details on why this site exists and what you can expect to see here. We will begin to post articles, images, and videos that will likely rock your world.

One good place to start is to question standard cosmology. This article does a good job of showing what’s wrong with the Big Bang/Gravity model, and what’s right with the Plasma/Electric Universe model.

The Globe Killer – The Angular Size Adjustment

I want to be clear that I’m not 100% certain of what I’m arguing here and so I welcome the truth even if it contradicts my understanding but I believe I’m right.  One thing to keep in mind is that these angular size corrections are not applicable in any other circumstance; it only applies to calculating the “hidden” amount.  The point of this video was to create a ratio that will translate a distant apparent size of an object into a measurement in feet, because the angular size (degrees) is inversely proportional to the distance in feet.

Plane surveyors wouldn’t learn the angular size reduction as no one calculates blockage from a visual perspective; it has no on-the-spot ground application.  Mathematicians probably would never have learned the angular size reduction as well; we are essentially combining curvature drop, visual angles, the Pythagorean Theorem, perspective, and angular size into one formula.  I believe this is all new territory but relies on common sense.

If you are at 6 feet and zoom in with the camera, the horizon will be 3 miles away from you under the dimensions of the globe.  http://www.ringbell.co.uk/info/hdist.htm.  That 3-mile mark constitutes the top of the alleged bulge from the observer’s perspective.  That’s an unquestionable fact of the globe model.  I can zoom in all I want with a telescope or ultra-zoom camera but I will not see anything flat (like water) beyond the 3-mile mark as it would be obscured by the purported bulge of the earth.  I think everyone must agree with this first assertion (maybe some might claim standard refraction would put the refracted horizon at 3.2 miles instead of 3 miles but that’s really irrelevant for this discussion).

Just like the picture of the man at 0:26 the video above.  This is perspective we witness on a daily basis but we rarely ponder what’s happening.  I can take an ultra-zoom camera and zoom in all I want on the man’s head, but because he has a larger respective angular size being closer, he will block the more distant wall even though the wall is actually much taller.  There is the actual size of the distant object and the angular or apparent size of the object based on distance.  Again, I think everyone can agree so far as this is all common sense.

I think it’s easier to think of Denali and the alleged bulge as 2D cutout pictures but at the same actual height but no depth.  The supposed bulge height would, at 135 miles and a 6-foot observer, would be 3,038 feet high.  If you instead imagine the bulge as a wall and place the 20,310-foot Denali cutout just a foot beyond the bulge wall, the wall would understandably block 3,038 feet.

That’s how the curvature calculators work but the hidden becomes 11,616 feet based on the angle from the observer.

Now, presuming the world is flat, move the Denali cutout 5 miles, 10 miles, 100 miles, and 132 miles beyond the wall.  The wall remained stationary but Denali just shrunk to 2% the size it was at the beginning.  Do you see how the wall would quickly block Denali?

Look at the picture of Denali again and see how the trees block roughly 1/3 of Denali.  You can see from the closer pictures that the rest of Denali is hidden behind the trees.


Remember at 135 miles, Denali would have an apparent size of only 500 feet.  Now, the trees blocking 1/3 of Denali makes perfect sense.  There’s no difference between those trees and the claimed bulge of the earth’s curvature.  You can zoom in on the trees and increase their angular size (along with Denali) but the ratio blocked by the trees will remain exactly the same. The only time the bulge wouldn’t have a different effect is if the bulge wall was moved with Denali at the same distance. Then they would shrink together but that wouldn’t happen with the globe.

Maybe it’s easier if you imagine the wall as 500 feet tall and unrelated to any bulge height to separate it from curvature. Can you see how Denali will shrink behind that 500-foot wall until it disappears (135 miles later) and it has nothing to do with curvature?

The angular size reduction is a globe killer as the oft-repeated claim that refraction levels the globe visually is 100% impossible to the extent to make Denali disappear after only 50 miles distance.

Is Flat Earth a PSYOP? (Satire)

The evil Cabal must have been playing with an ultra-zoom camera like the Nikon P900 and discovered that boats don’t actually disappear over a curvature and that objects that should be hidden well below the curvature weren’t (e.g.,10 miles distance = 66 feet of curvature; 100 miles distance = 6,667 feet of curvature) – “Hey we can see a mountain 100 miles away that should be entirely covered by the curvature; let’s use that fact for discrediting conspiracy theorists.”

Of course, the evil Cabal already knew that refraction bent images in an arc over the earth and just had the amazing ability to trick us by making the world appear flat whether on the shore or at the tops of the mountains. Refraction also somehow causes the horizon to remain at eye level as the observer increases height but mainstream science hasn’t disclosed a decent explanation for that one yet for the sole purpose of building support for the scheme to discredit conspiracy theorists.

Similarly, the Cabal knew that gravity loves to trick us into believing in a flat earth because gravity (1) can automatically cause airplanes (and submarines) to dip their nose to account for the EXTREME adjustment for curvature, (2) can Velcro the atmosphere to the ground so that there’s zero proof that the atmosphere is attached to ball spinning at 1,000 mph and so airplanes traveling from any direction aren’t affected by the spin of the earth, (3) can eliminate any sense that the earth is spinning and twirling in space with varying centrifugal forces, and (4) can bend water perfectly over a ball. But when the Cabal saw that the ultra-zoom camera showed objects that should have been below the curvature, that’s when these evil men came up with the idea of faking flat earth so that no one would believe “conspiracy theorists” ever again.

The Cabal knew they could build a convincing case for flat earth because some people would foolishly question the magical and insensible abilities of refraction and gravity. Coincidentally, everyone was taught since children through media and school programming that flat earth was the most stupid idea ever and so it would be perfect to resurrect flat earth only for the crazy “conspiracy theorists.” But maybe children were brainwashed into hating flat earth for hundreds of years and every movie was required to include a globe somewhere so that people would develop a love for the globe just so the Cabal could later use that for discrediting “conspiracy theorists” – wow, they’re prescient.

But the PSYOP needed some serious work. First, the Cabal knew that gyroscopes were supposed to measure the movement and curvature of the earth (according to Foucault) but decided instead to design every future gyroscope so that every new high-precision gyroscope would show a flat and stationary plane. Don’t ask me how the Cabal managed to program every high-precision gyroscope to fake a flat earth but they did. It’s working perfectly as many flat earthers are purchasing gyroscopes to prove the flat earth unaware the gyroscopes were designed to give false no curvature/rotation readings. Second, the Cabal had to add some professionals to the mix. To do this, the Cabal managed to convince surveyors that they never had to account for the curvature by ignoring the curvature altogether in their textbooks and work – it’s called “plane surveying” just for that reason. Sure, surveyors like to account for every inch in a project, but 6,667 feet of curvature over a road project of 100 miles – that could be ignored entirely as the globe magic is powerful at making everything work out just perfectly. But flat earthers would be dumb enough to ask questions about it. It’s perfect. I don’t know how they did it, but the Cabal also added missile operators, pilots, engineers, snipers, and others, who should account for the curvature, to somehow proclaim that curvature and the movement of the atmosphere are never taken into account in their work. Or, maybe they just paid off these professionals (and wrote false text books) to lie about it and make it appear that curvature and rotation aren’t accounted for even though they really are. Yep, that makes sense. Third, in order to really make the flat earth believable, the Cabal got NASA and all of the other space programs to fake everything including all of the photographs of the earth from space. Maybe that’s why they faked the moon landings – so that conspiracy theorists could point out all of the fakery and logically begin considering whether NASA lied about the flat earth as well.

Of course, the Cabal has answers to (1) why the North Star has never moved in known history even though the solar system is chasing after the sun at tremendous speeds in giant vortices (while maintaining a magical horizontal plane), (2) how the atmosphere can parallel an enormous and endless vacuum, and (3) why the sun and moon appear local in weather balloon footage, but the Cabal hasn’t released the legitimate answers because they wanted the flat earth to be believable. In fact, the Cabal made some of the answers so dumb to these legitimate questions that these flat earth investigators would sense the huge problems and question the globe. As a final strategy, the Cabal hired a large host of paid-for propagandists (including upper-level minions such as Neil deGrasse Tyson, Stephen Hawking, Barack Obama, Kerry, et al.) to harass and make fun of flat earth on YouTube and all conspiracy discussion boards. Who would believe flat earth unless you had Neil deGrasse Tyson calling them threats to democracy?

Yep, flat earth is definitely a PSYOP.

Battle Of The Plane(T) – Episode 1.0 – Introductions

ROWBOTHAM 3 – Confirmed – Bonneville Salt Flats Test – Earth is Flat

Rowbotham 2 -CONFIRMED- The Earth Is Flat (BOTP-1)

© 2017   Taboo Conspiracy | Powered by WordPress | Log in